HR Excellence in Research

The University of Copenhagen (UCPH) is recognised by the European Commission for its commitment to foster good working conditions and career development for researchers by complying with The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for the recruitment of researchers (ECRCC).

The European Commission launched ECRCC in 2005 to support a strong research area in Europe and to meet the potential serious shortage of researchers, which could be identified according to the Commission. The initiatives are part of the efforts to establish a functioning and open "European Research Area" called "ERA", under the Lisbon process to create jobs and growth in Europe.

HR Excellence in Research award (previously HRS4R) is a tool that helps research institutions and funding organisations on a voluntary basis to comply with the 40 principles of the Charter & Code (C&C) by way of an internal self-assessment.

It is not a prerequisite for participating in the EU Research Framework Programme, but the acknowledgement of the university and the awarding of the logo is linked to the compliance of article 32 of the H2020 contracts/projects, providing the obligation to take measures to implement C&C for the benefit of all researchers and their institution.

As a holder of this acknowledgement, UCPH will continue to participate in national and European evaluation and benchmarking exercises. The recognition followed the submission of the UCPH action plan in July 2015 to the European Commission.

The process

In June 2017, UCPH reached step 4 in the HRS4R process, and forwarded an internal review (self-evaluation) of the action plan to the Commission. At the same time, UCPH filled out a checklist for the implementation of the ‘Principles of Open, Transparent and Merit-Based Recruitment (OTM-R)’ processes at UCPH. The work was carried out by a working group with representatives from the research communities and the Central Collaboration Committee.

In December 2020, UCPH initiated the recurring HRS4R process by preparing for the internal review visit to apply for a renewal of the HR Excellence in Research Award. UCPH added an OTM-R policy, which is embedded in the HR strategy and action plan for the years to come.

In December 2025 the UCPH Faculty Board was appointed as the Steering Committee for activities related to the HR Excellence in Research. The board consists of the Rectorate (Rector, Prorector for Education and Prorector for Research and Innovation), 8 appointed Professors (two from the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, two from the Faculty of Science, and one from each of the Faculty of Law, the Faculty of Theology, the Faculty of Social Sciences and the Faculty of Humanities) and the Head of Division for HR Development and Strategy. The Faculty Board also advises the Rectorate on matters related to practices regarding quality, recruitment, talent attraction and merit practice.  

In 2026 UCPH carried out a new internal review and updated the action plan, approved by the Steering Committee to apply for a renewal of the HR Excellence in Research Award.

In 2027-2028 UCPH will carry out a new gap analysis and develop a new action plan. A thorough and involving process will be planned.  

 

In the period from autumn 2013 to summer 2015, UCPH worked on the HRS4R process. A working group consisting of representatives from the scientists in the Collaboration Committee (HSU) and representatives from the senior management worked in the fall 2013 on identification of which target areas and priorities UCPH as part of HRS4R process should have a special focus on.

The working group partly choose to bring new stakes and targets to the Action Plan, however also picking- up targets and stakes that were already in the pipeline, but not yet in process. Since then, UCPH and the Commission have been in an ongoing dialogue to clarify and accurately describe the processes UCPH has had in relation to the choice of priorities. Why was it exactly career paths, career, women, leadership and academic freedom that were chosen? How did researchers at the University helped to decide this?

This Action plan of the HRS4R is a result of an involving process including the active participation of various representatives from all parts of UCPH. Hence, the work is linked to both the Top-management, broadly amongst the researchers, representatives from the Faculty Union Representatives, and amongst leading researchers of different parts of UCPH.

The Working Group

The first Working Group consisted of:

  • Dean Ulf Hedetoft, Faculty of Humanities
  • Dean Troels Østergaard Sørensen, Faculties of Social Sciences
  • Head of education Stine Jørgensen, Faculty of Law
  • Associate professor Leif Søndergaard (member of the General Collaboration Committee), Faculty of Science
  • Professor Allan Randrup Thomsen, Faculty of Health
  • Associate professor Peter Birkman Andersen, (Member of Faculty Collaboration Committee), Faculty of Humanities
  • Professor and head of department Niels-Henrik von Holstein-Rathlou
  • Head of department, corporate HR at UCPH, Lis Henriksen Bak
  • Secretary for the working group, senior HR advisor Elisabeth Rasmussen.

Furthermore, the Internal Gap and the Action Plan was discussed and consequently adjusted at a hearing process involving all the members of the General Collaboration Committee at their meeting on 26 February 2014.

The Working Group and the General Collaboration Committee have assessed the 40 principles of the GAP-analysis. The principles are in all to a large degree implemented as practice and fields of improvements that UCPH and the faculties are already working on as part of the general organizational development and general improvements of practice in research and as part of HRM practice at UCPH.

All current and future projects and actions undertaken are embedded in specific working groups, where participants in each group are carefully chosen to reflect UCPHs immense diversity. Each group comprises of different people representing a variety of different faculties, gender, age, professional background, and experience and knowledge on the specific topic. An important focus is that PhD-students, postdocs and other employees are involved in the development of procedures, guidelines and can share best practices.